30
|
|
Post by hsbob on Feb 22, 2022 13:37:48 GMT -6
It was probably time for Hull to fully “retire” but it bothers me a little if it was for being an alleged racist or whatever as if the club is doing a cleansing of anyone who has skeletons in the closet. If that’s the case they may as well shut the doors. And they keep an AC who's admitted to physically abusing players. If somebody in the press re-ran the story right now,it'd probably be Crawford's ass but the press is afraid of the mean old man (Rocky) now!LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by vadarx on Feb 22, 2022 16:55:19 GMT -6
It was probably time for Hull to fully “retire” but it bothers me a little if it was for being an alleged racist or whatever as if the club is doing a cleansing of anyone who has skeletons in the closet. If that’s the case they may as well shut the doors. And they keep an AC who's admitted to physically abusing players. If somebody in the press re-ran the story right now,it'd probably Crawford's ass but the press is afraid of the mean old man (Rocky) now!LOL! I dunno about that. they might be afraid of losing their credentials, but I don't think they are afraid of Rockwell. they smell the blood... gotta think that Crawford has to go here this off-season, too. which, now that I think about it, probably means my answer about King in the Hagel thread is probably off, cuz I doubt he comes back without Crawford and Crawford gots to go... |
|
|
|
Post by phill9 on Feb 22, 2022 18:14:18 GMT -6
And they keep an AC who's admitted to physically abusing players. If somebody in the press re-ran the story right now,it'd probably Crawford's ass but the press is afraid of the mean old man (Rocky) now!LOL! I dunno about that. they might be afraid of losing their credentials, but I don't think they are afraid of Rockwell. they smell the blood... gotta think that Crawford has to go here this off-season, too. which, now that I think about it, probably means my answer about King in the Hagel thread is probably off, cuz I doubt he comes back without Crawford and Crawford gots to go... Typically when a new head coach comes in, pretty sure the assistants are his picks. So Crawford likely gone if a new head coach is hired |
|
|
|
Post by Tater on Feb 23, 2022 3:18:01 GMT -6
I dunno about that. they might be afraid of losing their credentials, but I don't think they are afraid of Rockwell. they smell the blood... gotta think that Crawford has to go here this off-season, too. which, now that I think about it, probably means my answer about King in the Hagel thread is probably off, cuz I doubt he comes back without Crawford and Crawford gots to go...Didn't he voluntarily goes through some type of sensitivity (or such) counseling for it? Maybe I'm not remembering it correctly.
|
|
|
|
Post by vadarx on Feb 23, 2022 3:42:00 GMT -6
I dunno about that. they might be afraid of losing their credentials, but I don't think they are afraid of Rockwell. they smell the blood... gotta think that Crawford has to go here this off-season, too. which, now that I think about it, probably means my answer about King in the Hagel thread is probably off, cuz I doubt he comes back without Crawford and Crawford gots to go...Didn't he voluntarily goes through some type of sensitivity (or such) counseling for it? Maybe I'm not remembering it correctly.
I believe so. won't matter. |
|
|
|
Post by galaxytrash on Feb 23, 2022 4:33:54 GMT -6
I dunno about that. they might be afraid of losing their credentials, but I don't think they are afraid of Rockwell. they smell the blood... gotta think that Crawford has to go here this off-season, too. which, now that I think about it, probably means my answer about King in the Hagel thread is probably off, cuz I doubt he comes back without Crawford and Crawford gots to go...Didn't he voluntarily goes through some type of sensitivity (or such) counseling for it? Maybe I'm not remembering it correctly.
yes he did. statement from the team and marc crawford december '19. it seems sincere enough to me but who knows. he says he's been in counselling addressing his shortcomings since around 2009. you be the judge. this is old news but i'm going to highlight crawford's side of it again anyways. www.nhl.com/blackhawks/news/release-statements-from-blackhawks-assistant-coach-marc-crawford/c-312668254Recently, allegations have resurfaced about my conduct earlier in my coaching career. Players like Sean Avery, Harold Druken, Patrick O'Sullivan and Brent Sopel have had the strength to publicly come forward and I am deeply sorry for hurting them. I offer my sincere apologies for my past behavior.
I got into coaching to help people, and to think that my actions in any way caused harm to even one player fills me with tremendous regret and disappointment in myself. I used unacceptable language and conduct toward players in hopes of motivating them, and, sometimes went too far. As I deeply regret this behavior, I have worked hard over the last decade to improve both myself and my coaching style.
I have made sincere efforts to address my inappropriate conduct with the individuals involved as well as the team at large. I have regularly engaged in counseling over the last decade where I have faced how traumatic my behavior was towards others. I learned new ways of expressing and managing my emotions. I take full responsibility for my actions. Moving forward, I will continue to improve myself, to listen to those that I may have hurt, and learn from their experiences. My goal is to approach all players, past and present, with empathy and understanding. My hope, as a coach and a person, is to create environments of dignity and respect.
about sopel .www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/marc-crawford-brent-sopel-allegations-1.5386296
Former NHL player Brent Sopel says his stories on a year-old podcast about rough treatment from Marc Crawford were meant "to entertain the listener" and not to make allegations against his former coach.
Speaking on a Barstool Sports podcast a year ago, Sopel, who played for Crawford in Vancouver, said the coach "kicked me, he choked me, he grabbed the back of my jersey and just pulling it back."
Sopel said in a statement posted to Twitter on Thursday that he "told those stories as a former NHL defenceman, and not as a victim."about avery. www.chicagotribune.com/sports/blackhawks/ct-chicago-blackhawks-marc-crawford-sean-avery-20191203-sey7vg534bec5bvsxndsnsc2p4-story.htmli think it was 2 days after avery made the original allegations against crawford he said this. In a recent interview with the New York Post, Avery said Crawford kicked him so hard in the ass that it left a mark.
On Monday night, Avery shared a video on Twitter in which he said Crawford was his “second-favorite NHL coach” and that he had “every right in the world to kick me in the ass. He should have spanked my ass a little bit more. I deserved it. I loved Crow.”about o'sullivan. there's not that much out there. he has a troubled relationship with his father but about crawford it was in l.a. as well (same as avery). www.markerzone.com/news/?10491O'Sullivan has brought up Crawford's physical abuse in the past, mentioning a story in his book Breaking Away of him being kicked by his former coach while playing for the L.A. Kings. Asked if he would be willing to accept a true apology from Crawford, O'Sullivan stated he would and added "My phone number hasn't changed in 15 years."about harold druken. www.saltwire.com/nova-scotia/sports/patrick-johnston-add-harold-druken-to-the-crowd-decrying-marc-crawfords-coaching-past-383853/likely has the worst to say about his former coach. “I wouldn’t let Marc Crawford coach my dog!! Loving this investigation. Karma is a lovely thing,”
He spoke later on Newfoundland TV , calling Crawford “hands down the worst human being I’ve ever met.”
“Being called a dumb Newfie or a stupid Newfie or he’s going to send me back on the boats in Newfoundland, that’s just as offensive to me as it is being called something that’s derogatory,” he told NTV. He said the coach would kick and hit him and would also verbally berate him in front of team management.
“He was absolutely ridiculous.”i don't really care if crawford stays or goes. i'm not even sure what part of the game he coaches. PP? PK? defense? they all pretty much suck this year and every year for a while. so if they shitcan him...no skin off my ass. but in response to your post, tater...oh so long ago : ) ...crawford's last documented mis-step was many many years ago. possibly 14 years ago. if he hasn't changed his ways he's doing a good job in hiding it. |
|
|
|
Post by BigT on Feb 23, 2022 7:09:33 GMT -6
We’ve touched on this recently. But coaches have to continue to change and get better too. Can’t just be the players. I think the Hawks need a newer style coach with a fresh approach. I thought Colliton might actually be that guy, but I don’t think he’s much of a motivator. He needs a few years of assistant coaching to learn from other guys.
I personally don’t see King or Crawford around much longer!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by galaxytrash on Apr 14, 2022 17:47:31 GMT -6
don't know if anyone gives a shit about this anymore because i'm not sure if i do but the NHLPA voted to make the kyle davidson beach investigation's findings public.
might be some things of interest. might not be either. find out soon enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by phill9 on Apr 14, 2022 17:55:44 GMT -6
don't know if anyone gives a shit about this anymore because i'm not sure if i do but the NHLPA voted to make the kyle davidson investigation's findings public. might be some things of interest. might not be either. find out soon enough. Did you mean Kyle Beach investigation's findings? |
|
|
|
Post by galaxytrash on Apr 14, 2022 18:02:31 GMT -6
don't know if anyone gives a shit about this anymore because i'm not sure if i do but the NHLPA voted to make the kyle davidson investigation's findings public. might be some things of interest. might not be either. find out soon enough. Did you mean Kyle Beach investigation's findings? oh ffs! they're doing that one too. : ) |
|
|
|
Post by LordKOTL on Jul 23, 2022 20:50:39 GMT -6
now there's allegations of another sexual assault against 6 players from the 2003 canadian WJC team and a police investigation is opening. video evidence apparently. what a mess hockey canada is in. This is horrifying. I cannot believe they would allow this shit to happen. They need to clean house immediately and start over with new people. This is an organization that needs women on board. I could go on. I’ve played and seen some bad shit. I’ve heard the most racist shit. Im not saying it’s right. But sexual assault is on a different level. If that’s the culture. Count me out!!! I have to say that with all of the incidents like the Theo Fleury, Beach, and all of the other ones it really doesn't shock me that this would happen--that those with the power to do anything would "let" it happen. If it brings them in more cash, they'll sweep it under the rug. If they think a scandal will make them lose cash, they'll sweep it under the rug. What a lot of these organizations need is people in positions of power ready, willing, and able to throw the book at the predators and enablers once convicted beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law, as well as doing what it takes to get the alleged victim and the alleged assailant separated until the legal process is complete--irrespective of the negative light or the monetary impact. |
|
|
|
Post by nighbor on Jul 24, 2022 0:38:34 GMT -6
A lot of news coming out now. Text messages etc. Unfortunately there’s 2 current Hawks that we’re on the team. If 7 were involved, the odds are much greater one of them were involved. Here’s the list, and I’m starting to look at how many players were dropped or traded from this list recently. Makes you wonder!!! www.hockeycanada.ca/en-ca/team-canada/men/junior/2017-18/world-championship/stats/team-rosters?teamid=175Edit: I believe if found guilty, the NHL players will be banished. I’m not passing judgment on any of them. Just stating that if guilty of anything, I think the NHL won’t tolerate it!!! As well they should; like Voynov. The only problem is that you have a bunch of fans (yet horrible humans who should be banished themselves) who though that Voynov should have been let back in the NHL. Can't imagine the league banishing Makar regardless of his involvement. I can. The PR optics would kill the NHL if they found out that a high-profile player was involved in a scandal like this and the NHL did nothing. Voynov was deported for beating his wife, and recently Bobby Hull was stripped of his ambassadorship because of his past--which in my estimation he never should have gotten back. The Beach scandal is also still fresh in the minds of the NHL brass and if Makar has any guilt proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt, they will make a scapegoat out of him. Yes - probably lots of the guys "knew" even if they weren't involved. Just like with Beach and the Hawks. In today's world just knowing and not reporting can be a problem. Not quite. The Beach scenario stinks on a lot of levels, and part of the problem is that if a person is not a mandatory reporter, going to the authorities behind the back of a victim when the victim does not want to go to the authorities does more damage to the case than not. Then you risk having a victim who will not cooperate with the authorities and won't disclose, which effectively tanks the case and allows a sexual predator (like Aldrich) to go free. In the players' case, the best thing they could have done was have Beach' back and encourage him to go to the authorities (even offer to go with him for moral support) rather than report behind his back. The brass was a different case; in that there are those who were in the infamous meeting, like definitely Stan and McDonut, who could have kept Aldrich and Beach separate, but didn't--irrespective of whoever said they'd handle it. I believe the first person Beach contacted was an AC who was a former cop and I would like to believe that he would have tried to have Beach report the assault and offered to go with him. Your assertion that Stan and McDonut were the only ones capable of keeping the two separate was false as Q and the other coaches would have kept them apart to avoid some of the stench rubbing off on them. |
|
|
|
Post by hsbob on Jul 24, 2022 10:47:19 GMT -6
As well they should; like Voynov. The only problem is that you have a bunch of fans (yet horrible humans who should be banished themselves) who though that Voynov should have been let back in the NHL. I can. The PR optics would kill the NHL if they found out that a high-profile player was involved in a scandal like this and the NHL did nothing. Voynov was deported for beating his wife, and recently Bobby Hull was stripped of his ambassadorship because of his past--which in my estimation he never should have gotten back. The Beach scandal is also still fresh in the minds of the NHL brass and if Makar has any guilt proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt, they will make a scapegoat out of him. Not quite. The Beach scenario stinks on a lot of levels, and part of the problem is that if a person is not a mandatory reporter, going to the authorities behind the back of a victim when the victim does not want to go to the authorities does more damage to the case than not. Then you risk having a victim who will not cooperate with the authorities and won't disclose, which effectively tanks the case and allows a sexual predator (like Aldrich) to go free. In the players' case, the best thing they could have done was have Beach' back and encourage him to go to the authorities (even offer to go with him for moral support) rather than report behind his back. The brass was a different case; in that there are those who were in the infamous meeting, like definitely Stan and McDonut, who could have kept Aldrich and Beach separate, but didn't--irrespective of whoever said they'd handle it. I believe the first person Beach contacted was an AC who was a former cop and I would like to believe that he would have tried to have Beach report the assault and offered to go with him. Your assertion that Stan and McDonut were the only ones capable of keeping the two separate was false as Q and the other coaches would have kept them apart to avoid some of the stench rubbing off on them. I've absolved Q AND SB because McD told both(he told all in the meeting actually), that he was aware of, and he would personally handle the situation but the more I think about it ,either SB or Q,it was his coaching staff,could have demanded Aldrige's immediate dismissal and still allow McD to handle the rest. Even if the encounter was consensual like Aldrige claimed,which is debatable with his record,it still included a prostitute,alcohol and an underage,inebriated 20yro player at an AC's apartment who supplied the alcohol at best and possibly something much worse. Q didn't want to lose his video dept. going into the SFC and he's payin' one hell of a price for that decision. And YES,the outraged Paul Vincent with his law enforcement background could have marched Beach directly into HR or the nearest police station but he didn't for some reason. This current scandal also involves an underage,inebriated victim. Yeah,the age for sexual consent may be 18 in most jurisdictions,but feed that teenager illegal underage alcohol and you can throw that consent out the window as it should be. One kid prowlin' around lookin' to get some hockey groupie drunk enough to screw when he should be concentrating on the biggest games of his life is bad enough but inviting a bunch of buddies to take part? Is there ANY chaperoning of these teenagers going on whatsoever? |
|
|
|
Post by LordKOTL on Jul 24, 2022 11:27:57 GMT -6
As well they should; like Voynov. The only problem is that you have a bunch of fans (yet horrible humans who should be banished themselves) who though that Voynov should have been let back in the NHL. I can. The PR optics would kill the NHL if they found out that a high-profile player was involved in a scandal like this and the NHL did nothing. Voynov was deported for beating his wife, and recently Bobby Hull was stripped of his ambassadorship because of his past--which in my estimation he never should have gotten back. The Beach scandal is also still fresh in the minds of the NHL brass and if Makar has any guilt proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt, they will make a scapegoat out of him. Not quite. The Beach scenario stinks on a lot of levels, and part of the problem is that if a person is not a mandatory reporter, going to the authorities behind the back of a victim when the victim does not want to go to the authorities does more damage to the case than not. Then you risk having a victim who will not cooperate with the authorities and won't disclose, which effectively tanks the case and allows a sexual predator (like Aldrich) to go free. In the players' case, the best thing they could have done was have Beach' back and encourage him to go to the authorities (even offer to go with him for moral support) rather than report behind his back. The brass was a different case; in that there are those who were in the infamous meeting, like definitely Stan and McDonut, who could have kept Aldrich and Beach separate, but didn't--irrespective of whoever said they'd handle it. I believe the first person Beach contacted was an AC who was a former cop and I would like to believe that he would have tried to have Beach report the assault and offered to go with him. Your assertion that Stan and McDonut were the only ones capable of keeping the two separate was false as Q and the other coaches would have kept them apart to avoid some of the stench rubbing off on them. Former cops are not mandatory reporters. He may have tried to get him to report and even offered to go with (I seem to recall the report saying so), but he he is under no legal constraint to report the assault to the police with or without the victim's consent--and doing so can actually harm rather than help a case. Being an ex-cop he probably would have known that--if Beach wasn't ready to disclose and someone forced his hand he would have most likely clammed up. People who deal with the legal aspects of rape and sexual assault know that. Further, I said that Stan and McDonut *definitely* could have kept them separate because both had the power to put Aldrich on administrative leave. Could Q have? I don't know. I think maybe he might have had that authority, and the fact that he resigned gives credence to the fact that he might have had the authority and did nothing. The other coaches might not have had that authority to keep Beach and Aldrich de facto separate. If you have proof of who was able to keep Beach and Aldrich separate, I think we'd all love to hear it. No one on the 'hawks was a mandatory reporter; the closest would have been Gary, and that fuckwit actually told beach it was his fault; if he was still practicing he should have had all of his licenses taken away. |
|
|
|
Post by nighbor on Jul 24, 2022 16:58:38 GMT -6
I believe the first person Beach contacted was an AC who was a former cop and I would like to believe that he would have tried to have Beach report the assault and offered to go with him. Your assertion that Stan and McDonut were the only ones capable of keeping the two separate was false as Q and the other coaches would have kept them apart to avoid some of the stench rubbing off on them. Former cops are not mandatory reporters. He may have tried to get him to report and even offered to go with (I seem to recall the report saying so), but he he is under no legal constraint to report the assault to the police with or without the victim's consent--and doing so can actually harm rather than help a case. Being an ex-cop he probably would have known that--if Beach wasn't ready to disclose and someone forced his hand he would have most likely clammed up. People who deal with the legal aspects of rape and sexual assault know that. Further, I said that Stan and McDonut *definitely* could have kept them separate because both had the power to put Aldrich on administrative leave. Could Q have? I don't know. I think maybe he might have had that authority, and the fact that he resigned gives credence to the fact that he might have had the authority and did nothing. The other coaches might not have had that authority to keep Beach and Aldrich de facto separate. If you have proof of who was able to keep Beach and Aldrich separate, I think we'd all love to hear it. No one on the 'hawks was a mandatory reporter; the closest would have been Gary, and that fuckwit actually told beach it was his fault; if he was still practicing he should have had all of his licenses taken away. HC Q had the power to reassign Aldrich to duties that did not require dealing with players. |
|
|
|
Post by LordKOTL on Jul 24, 2022 17:17:25 GMT -6
Former cops are not mandatory reporters. He may have tried to get him to report and even offered to go with (I seem to recall the report saying so), but he he is under no legal constraint to report the assault to the police with or without the victim's consent--and doing so can actually harm rather than help a case. Being an ex-cop he probably would have known that--if Beach wasn't ready to disclose and someone forced his hand he would have most likely clammed up. People who deal with the legal aspects of rape and sexual assault know that. Further, I said that Stan and McDonut *definitely* could have kept them separate because both had the power to put Aldrich on administrative leave. Could Q have? I don't know. I think maybe he might have had that authority, and the fact that he resigned gives credence to the fact that he might have had the authority and did nothing. The other coaches might not have had that authority to keep Beach and Aldrich de facto separate. If you have proof of who was able to keep Beach and Aldrich separate, I think we'd all love to hear it. No one on the 'hawks was a mandatory reporter; the closest would have been Gary, and that fuckwit actually told beach it was his fault; if he was still practicing he should have had all of his licenses taken away. HC Q had the power to reassign Aldrich to duties that did not require dealing with players. And if that's indeed the case, Q deserved everything he got irrespective of what McDonagh said--even 10 years ago. That's why I think he resigned even though I have no tangible proof. If he could have kept Aldrich away from Beach he should have. Ditto with Stan, & MacIsaac. McDonough should have been raked over the coals because he said he'd take care of it, but didn't do Jack or shit. Of course, that list is not exhaustive. |
|
|
|
Post by nighbor on Jul 24, 2022 19:05:38 GMT -6
HC Q had the power to reassign Aldrich to duties that did not require dealing with players. And if that's indeed the case, Q deserved everything he got irrespective of what McDonagh said--even 10 years ago. That's why I think he resigned even though I have no tangible proof. If he could have kept Aldrich away from Beach he should have. Ditto with Stan, & MacIsaac. McDonough should have been raked over the coals because he said he'd take care of it, but didn't do Jack or shit. Of course, that list is not exhaustive. The problem with crime is that it has already happened before you know about lt. I am sure that Stan and Q along with his coaching staff kept them seperated when informed of the situation. Unfortunately at the time not enough was done by the man in charge and there was colateral damage. |
|
|
|
Post by LordKOTL on Jul 25, 2022 7:33:44 GMT -6
And if that's indeed the case, Q deserved everything he got irrespective of what McDonagh said--even 10 years ago. That's why I think he resigned even though I have no tangible proof. If he could have kept Aldrich away from Beach he should have. Ditto with Stan, & MacIsaac. McDonough should have been raked over the coals because he said he'd take care of it, but didn't do Jack or shit. Of course, that list is not exhaustive. The problem with crime is that it has already happened before you know about lt. I am sure that Stan and Q along with his coaching staff kept them seperated when informed of the situation. Unfortunately at the time not enough was done by the man in charge and there was colateral damage. If I remember the report correctly, there was no mention of anyone trying to keep Aldrich and Beach separate. If Stan or Q did at least tried to keep them separate, I think it would have mentioned since that could be exonerating information for either. |
|
|
|
Post by hsbob on Jul 25, 2022 9:12:38 GMT -6
The problem with crime is that it has already happened before you know about lt. I am sure that Stan and Q along with his coaching staff kept them seperated when informed of the situation. Unfortunately at the time not enough was done by the man in charge and there was colateral damage. If I remember the report correctly, there was no mention of anyone trying to keep Aldrich and Beach separate. If Stan or Q did at least tried to keep them separate, I think it would have mentioned since that could be exonerating information for either. Mistakes were obviously made but we have the benefit of insight and facts twelve years on that weren't available then and hindsight is always the best view. The only three personal reputations and careers to take hits(massve hits) are McD,SB and Q although McD did go to HR with the complaint after a disgusting two week wait. The HR director had his mental skills coach blame Beach and Aldrige was allowed to resign w/o a black mark or even mention of the incident on his record from what I gathered and neither McD,SB or Q can be blamed for that........the director of HR is the supposed expert in these situations and the dept. normally operates with autonomy. And in this instance,the director of HR made sure he kept it from ownership somehow too? |
|
|
|
Post by LordKOTL on Jul 25, 2022 14:08:59 GMT -6
If I remember the report correctly, there was no mention of anyone trying to keep Aldrich and Beach separate. If Stan or Q did at least tried to keep them separate, I think it would have mentioned since that could be exonerating information for either. Mistakes were obviously made but we have the benefit of insight and facts twelve years on that weren't available then and hindsight is always the best view. The only three personal reputations and careers to take hits(massve hits) are McD,SB and Q although McD did go to HR with the complaint after a disgusting two week wait. The HR director had his mental skills coach blame Beach and Aldrige was allowed to resign w/o a black mark or even mention of the incident on his record from what I gathered and neither McD,SB or Q can be blamed for that........the director of HR is the supposed expert in these situations and the dept. normally operates with autonomy. And in this instance,the director of HR made sure he kept it from ownership somehow too? HR always has the company's best interest in mind, and it's why I said my list is not exhaustive. I think there are plenty more careers that should have been sullied by thier inaction in the Beach fiasco. |
|
|
|
Post by mikeveisor on Nov 5, 2023 10:11:27 GMT -6
Chicago Tribune apparently has a story today of another sexual assault accuser from the 2010 Black Aces crew. Paywall on Trib site so unsure if it’s substantiated in any way or if a name other than Doe is published.
|
|
|
|
Post by T-man2010 on Nov 5, 2023 10:21:17 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by mikeveisor on Nov 5, 2023 10:27:05 GMT -6
I wonder if he was interviewed as part of the Beach investigation, either by the team/counsel or by the NHL. And if so, he MUST have been asked if he was aware of any other incidents involving that video guy - wonder how he answered. |
|
|
|
Post by T-man2010 on Nov 5, 2023 12:30:29 GMT -6
I wonder if he was interviewed as part of the Beach investigation, either by the team/counsel or by the NHL. And if so, he MUST have been asked if he was aware of any other incidents involving that video guy - wonder how he answered. Article says he was interviewed during the investigation. |
|
|
|
Post by galaxytrash on Nov 5, 2023 15:26:06 GMT -6
4 posts moved here just to stay ahead of things.
this thread was halfway down page 2. hopefully it finds it's way there again soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by vadarx on Nov 5, 2023 18:17:06 GMT -6
jfc
|
|
|
|
Post by vadarx on Nov 5, 2023 18:28:45 GMT -6
Doe’s lawsuit mirrors that of Beach’s, claiming that Aldrich used his influence as a conduit to the coaching staff to exert power over the player. The lawsuit alleges that Aldrich sent Doe harassing and explicit text messages and came up from behind him and “ground his penis against John Doe’s back and buttocks through his clothes,” according to the Chicago Tribune.
Doe spoke to the Jenner & Block investigators for the team-commissioned report in 2021. The report stated that “Black Ace 1 vehemently denied to us in writing and during his interview that he had any direct sexual encounters with Aldrich,” though the Chicago-based law firm of Romanucci & Blandin, which filed the suit, told the Chicago Tribune that many victims don’t understand what constitutes sexual assault until well after the fact.
Doe also told Jenner & Block that he was “chased around the ice by a former Blackhawks player who called Black Ace 1 a ‘f—-t’ and asked if Black Ace 1 ‘liked that blow job or what?’” around 2014.
fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by galaxytrash on Nov 5, 2023 21:24:41 GMT -6
if justice needs to be served then so be it, but i've had a gutful of this whole thing. i imagine many here feel the same. |
|
|
|
Post by bigbarn27 on Nov 5, 2023 23:07:10 GMT -6
Doe’s lawsuit mirrors that of Beach’s, claiming that Aldrich used his influence as a conduit to the coaching staff to exert power over the player. The lawsuit alleges that Aldrich sent Doe harassing and explicit text messages and came up from behind him and “ground his penis against John Doe’s back and buttocks through his clothes,” according to the Chicago Tribune. Doe spoke to the Jenner & Block investigators for the team-commissioned report in 2021. The report stated that “Black Ace 1 vehemently denied to us in writing and during his interview that he had any direct sexual encounters with Aldrich,” though the Chicago-based law firm of Romanucci & Blandin, which filed the suit, told the Chicago Tribune that many victims don’t understand what constitutes sexual assault until well after the fact. Doe also told Jenner & Block that he was “chased around the ice by a former Blackhawks player who called Black Ace 1 a ‘f—-t’ and asked if Black Ace 1 ‘liked that blow job or what?’” around 2014. fun. Need to remember none of the investigation is under oath stories can be changed gotta like the timing by the law firm. Good grief another kick to the balls but I was also wondering when It was gonna happen. |
|
|
|
Post by Nikos on Nov 6, 2023 7:39:51 GMT -6
I thought or read Jenner & Block did a complete and thorough investigation. Did this miss this one? I know the Hawks were fined I believe $2M, wonder if this has any type of "legs" will the NHL look to take away any draft picks.
|
|
